LITERARY ANALYSIS OF THE DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF ARCHETYPES AND METAPHORS

Авторы

  • Umarov Umidjon Akram o’g’li English teacher of Alat Specialized school umidjonumarov02121996@gmail.com
  • Xudoyqulov Nutfillo Sohib o’g’li English teacher of Turon Zarmed University nutfulloxudoyqulov6@gmail.com

Ключевые слова:

Archetypes, metaphors, symbol, figurative language, Jung’s theory, image of instinc, symbolic figures

Аннотация

This article interprets the meaning and functions of archetypes and metaphors as well as their peculiar features, reveals their similarities and differences, and analyzes their importance in the development of literary works.  Metaphors should be taken into account in a structured context. The other epistemic tools—archetypes, symbols, models, and theories—are thus discussed in relation to metaphors in this paper. A proper explication and definition of metaphors are essential for a theory of metaphors, but this is not the main goal of this paper. Instead, it aims to incorporate metaphors into a comprehensible language-based theory of meaning (after some definitional work has been resolved). Because of this, we must enter what might be referred to as the unfolding theory of language after taking an exemplaric look at the types of metaphors we are going to examine. Metaphors are a common occurrence in daily life and serve as both a prescientific tool and a device of poetic imagination. They allow us to change the context and go beyond the expressive limitations of literal language.

Библиографические ссылки

Akram o'g'li, Umarov Umidjon, and Sobirova Zarnigor Raximovna. "THE SYMBOL OF MIRROR IN ENGLISH CHILDREN'S LITERATURE AND ITS FANTASTIC FEATURES." Eurasian Journal of Academic Research 2.2 (2022): 70-74.

Akram o'g'li, Umarov Umidjon, Xudoyqulov Nutfillo Sohib o'g'li, and Yusupova Hilola O'ktamovna. "THE IMPORTANCE OF RIDDLES, PROVERBS AND TONGUE TWISTERS IN UZBEK CHILDREN'S LITERATURE." Eurasian Journal of Academic Research 2.2 (2022): 75-77.

Carl Jung, “The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious”, Princeton: Bollingen Foundation, 1959

Carolyn Marie Mamchur, “The Hero’s Journey”, 2009

Joseph Campbell, “The Power of Myth”, New York: Doubleday, 1988

June Singer, “Boundaries of the Soul: The Practice of Jung’s Psychology”, New York: Random House, 1994

Karen Basquez, ” Taking the archetypes to school,” The Assisi Institute Journal: Vol.1, 2014

Karin Barnaby and Pellegrino D’Acerino, eds., C. G. Jung and the Humanities: Toward a Hermeneutics of Culture (1990)

Laughlin, C.D. & Tiberia, V.A. "Archetypes: Toward a Jungian anthropology of consciousness", Anthropology of Consciousness, 2012

Michael Conforti, “Field, Form, and Fate: Patterns in Mind, Nature, and Psyche”, New Orleans, Spring Journal Books, 1999

Naomi Goldenberg, “Archetypal Theory after Jung,” Spring (1975)

Rakhimovna, Sobirova Zarnigor, and Umarov Umidjon Akram o’g’li. "UDC: 82.091 THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH CHILDREN’S LITERATURE AND ITS REPRESENTATIVES." SCIENTIFIC REPORTS OF BUKHARA STATE UNIVERSITY: 29.

Raya A. Jones, Mixed Metaphors and Narrative Shifts, Theory & Psychology, 10.1177/09593543030135008, 13, 5, (651-672), (2016).

Sohib o’g’li, Xudoyqulov Nutfillo, and Umarov Umidjon Akram o’g’li. "HISTORY OF UZBEK FOLKLORE GAMES AND THEIR PLACE IN CHILDREN'S LIVES." Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture 2.2 (2022): 403-408.

Stevens, Anthony, "The archetype”' (Chapter 3)", The Handbook of Jungian Psychology, 2006

William K. Wimsatt, Jr., and Cleanth Brooks, Literary Criticism: A Short History, 1957

Загрузки

Опубликован

2023-03-21