XALQARO ARBITRAJLARDA SHAXSGA DOIR MA’LUMOTLARNING DAXLSIZLIGI MASALALARINING QIYOSIY-HUQUQIY TAHLILI
Ключевые слова:
: shaxsga doir ma’lumot, shaxsga doir ma’lumotlarning daxlsizligi, arbitraj, maxfiylik, xalqaro tijorat arbitraj sudi, reglamentАннотация
: Mazkur maqolada xalqaro tijorat arbitrajida shaxsga doir bo’lgan ma’lumotlarning daxlsizligi, ushbu huquq buzilishi oqibatida vujudga kelishi mumkin bo’lgan oqibatlar izchil tahlil qilingan. Ushbu maqolaning dolzarbligi butun dunyoda axborot texnologiyasi rivojlanishi va globallashuvi bilan vujudga kelgan axborot xavfsizligi kuchayishi hamda turli xil yuqumli kasalliklar natijasida xalqaro arbitrajlarda onlayn sudlar tashkil etilishi bilan bog’liqdir. Ushbu ma’lumotlarni aniqligini oshirish maqsadida turli xil statistikalar va qonun hujjatlaridan keng foydalanildi. Mavzu doirasida xorijiy va milliy olimlarning fikrlaridan, ilmiy ishlaridan, qilgan tadqiqot natijalaridan, gazeta va jurnallardan, xorij mamlakatlari qonun hujjatlaridan maqsadli havolalar berildi. Shuningdek jadvallar bilan kreativ yondashish maqola mazmun mohiyatini yanada teranroq ochib berishga yordam bergan.
Библиографические ссылки
Margaret L. Mozes, Xalqaro tijorat arbitraj tamoyillari va amaliyoti, – Toshkent. 2020 B. – 250.
Moser M.J. va Ch. Bao, A Guide to the HKIAC Arbitration Rules, Oxford University press, 2022
Gulyamov S. “Kiber-huquq”-yangi kompleks huquq sohasi sifatida – 2020. – №.1
Bakhramovna M. Legal Regulation of Electronic Arbitration: Recognition and Execution of its Decisions, May 2022 // Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360356710_Legal_Regulation_of_Electronic_Arbitration_Recognition_and_Execution_of_its_Decisions [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
Akramov A, Nurmaxammatov A. Xalqaro arbitrajda maxfiylik vaoshkoralik o’rtasidagi qarama qarshiliklar // SAI. 2022. №Special Issue 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/xalqaro-arbitrajda-maxfiylik-vaoshkoralik-o-rtasidagi-qarama-qarshiliklar [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
Born, G. (2014). International commercial arbitration. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. P. 204
Ajibo I.K. Confidentiality in international commercial arbitration: assumptions of implied duty and a proposed solution. 2015 // Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286779462_CONFIDENTIALITY_IN_INTERNATIONAL_COMMERCIAL_ARBITRATION_ASSUMPTIONS_OF_IMPLIED_DUTY_AND_A_PROPOSED_SOLUTION [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
Михайловна E. Подходы к обеспечению конфиденциальности в международном коммерческом арбитраже // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2015. №11-1. Availbale at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/podhody-k-obespecheniyu-konfidentsialnosti-v-mezhdunarodnom-kommercheskom-arbitrazhe [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
Bakumenko V.V. Discovery of evidence in international commercial arbitration // МНИЖ. 2016. №7-1 (49). Availbale at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/discovery-of-evidence-in-international-commercial-arbitration [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: United Nations Organization, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Birlashgan millatlar tashkiloti, inson huquqlari umumjahon deklaratsiyasi) 24.10.1948. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
The official website: United Nations Human Rights office of the high Commissioner, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights // Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: United Nations Commission On International Trade Law, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), with amendments as adopted in 2006 // Available at:https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
Bitimga asoslangan investor-davlat arbitrajida shaffoflik to‘g‘risidagi YUNSITRAL qoidalari (2014) Available at www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts.html. [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: United Nations Commission On International Trade Law, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), with amendments as adopted in 2006 // Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/mediadocuments/uncitral/en/19-09955_e_ebook.pdf [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: The Hong Kong International arbitration centre, 2018 HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules // Available at:http://hkiac.org/arbitration/rules-practice-notes/administered-arbitration-rules/hkiac-administered-2018-2#45 [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: The Singapore International arbitration centre, SIAC Rules 2016 // Available at: https://siac.org.sg/siac-rules-2016 [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: LCIA (London International arbitration centre and ADR worldwire) LCIA Arbitration Rules // Available at: https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2020.aspx#Article%2030A [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: TIAC (Tashkent International Arbitration Centre at the chamber of commerce and industry of Uzbekistan), TIAC RULES 2021// Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c02f6d2977-2ae05d0a897a8/t/6352b96baa109a5a2a49bd9d/1666365808793/TIAC+RULES++OF+ARBITRATION+2021+.pdf [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
The official website: UNCTAD, Data Protection and Privacy Legislation Worldwide // Available at: https://unctad.org/page/data-protection-and-privacy-legislation-worldwide [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
Caratube International Oil Company LLP and Devincci Salah Hourani v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/13 // Available at: https://www.italaw.com/cases/2131 [Accessed on: 18.04.2023]
