COMPONENTS OF RUSSIAN CULINARONYMS, COMBINATION OF CULINARY AND LANGUAGE
Keywords:
Culinaronyms, material culture, peculiarities, correlation.Abstract
The purpose of this study is to point out the components in modern Russian culinaronyms. This work also presents components’ characteristics as a theoretical part for naming food. We have used the qualitative descriptive method to find out the components included in Russian culinaronyms. The results of this study indicate that there are a number of components in modern Russian food names such as culinary group (gathering a number of components related to cooking), human, time, and freedom (or author component). Moreover, these elements can beidentified with the help of different language tools. This research moreover reveals that one lexicon can constitute rotated component or doubled-component. The result of the study can be used by students and specialists in courses of lexicology and linguoculture. Besides, this study contributes to the stylistic features of culinary text type. This research focuses on systematizing components in Russian culinaronyms, introducing the new concept of ‘culinaronym component’ and its general qualities based on the combination of culinary and language.
References
Ashenkova, G. A. (2012). Phenomenon of personalization of things in the field of consumer communication on the material of anthropoculinaronyms in French languaje.
Bulletin of Irkursk state linguistic university, (1), 28-35.
Atkin, P., & Bowler, I. (2016). Food in society: economy, culture, geography. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315824819
Bakhtina, S. I. (2007). Borrowed vocabulary as part of the thematic group “Food and Drinks”(diachronic aspect). Bulletin of Chuvash state University, (3), 150-153.
Bator, M. (2016). On the Development of the English Culinary Recipe. Academic Journal of Modern Philology, (5), 7-15.
Bator, M. (2017). Rhyming recipes in medieval cookbooks. Linguistica Silesiana, (38), 95-109.
Bektasheva, A. A. (2018). Linguistic analysis of the onyms of the semantic field "French cuisine".Scripta manent, (24), 22-33.
Borovkova, A. V., Grekova, M. V., Zhivago, N. A., & Yurina, E. A. (2015). Dictionary of Russian food metaphor. - Volume 1: Dishes and Pros. Publishing house Tomsk.
Caroll, R. (1999). The middle english recipe as a text-type. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 100(1), 27-42. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/43315278
Dohra, F., Robert, S. Mulyaddi, Mara, U.R., &
Laili, S. (2020). The naming of Acehnese traditional culinary. Humanities & Social
Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 815-823. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8290.
Fellner, A. (2013). The flavours of multi-ethnic North-American literatures. CulinaryLinguistics: The Chef’s Special, John Benjsamins Publishing Company.241-260. https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.10.10fel
Gölarch, M. (1992). Text-types and language history: The cookery recipe. In M. Rissanen et al.
(eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics, Berlin;
New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Golarch, M. (2004). Text types and the history of English. Mouton de Gruyter
Novikova, O., Garipova, G., & Izimarieva, Z. (2019). Nominations of Molecular Cuisine Dishes: Lexical, Syntactic and Semantic Analysis. Space and Culture, India, 7(3), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i3.542
Tayupova, O. I., Ravilova, R. R., & Salimyanova, G. R. (2019). Structural and linguistic features of recipes from the perspective of intercultural communication. Communicative units in the light of modern scientific paradigm
Pavlovskaya, A. V. (2016). Russian cuisine in the context of globalization. History of food and traditions. Food of the peoples of the world, 11-24.
Protsenko, E. A., & Zhivokina, M. A. (2015).Interaction between russian and english as a bilateral vector of linguistic exchange. Russian linguistic bulletin, 1(1), 4-5.
Lazeeva, N. V. (2016). Structural and linguistic features of culinary recipes of the cookbook “Cooking for Friends” of Ramsey”. Innovative Science, 3(15), 176-179.
