EXPLORING THE CONTRASTS AND NEXUS OF LANGUAGE UNIVERSALS AND TYPOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF 'LANGUAGE UNIVERSALS AND LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY' AND 'TYPOLOGY AND UNIVERSALS'
Keywords:
language universals, linguistic typology, Greenbergian perspective, motivations, theoretical prerequisites, case marking, causative constructions, animacy, cognitive linguistics, usage-based approach, cognitive motivations, typological classification.Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of two seminal works in the field of linguistics: "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology" and "Typology and Universals". Through an examination of their methodologies, topicality, and contributions, the study aims to elucidate the contrasts and nexus between language universals and typology. Both works employ diverse methodologies, drawing upon qualitative and quantitative analyses, as well as empirical data from various linguistic subfields. They address pressing questions surrounding the nature of linguistic universals, typological patterns, and their implications for theoretical linguistics and cross-cultural communication. The topical relevance of the study is underscored in an era marked by globalization, where understanding linguistic diversity is crucial for fostering cross-cultural understanding. Furthermore, the article highlights the innovative contributions of these works, which challenge traditional assumptions and push the boundaries of linguistic inquiry. Ultimately, this comparative analysis offers fresh insights into the complex interplay between language universals and typological variation, inspiring future research directions and fostering a deeper appreciation for the intricacies of human language.
References
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. Walter de Gruyter.
Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. University of Chicago Press.
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and Universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.). (2013). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from http://wals.info/
Haspelmath, M. (2001). The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. Language Typology and Language Universals, 1(1), 149-186.
Nichols, J. (1992). Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. University of Chicago Press.
Bickel, B. (2007). Typology in the 21st Century: Major Currents in Linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(4), 396-409.
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of Adjective and Noun. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from http://wals.info/chapter/87
Dixon, R. M. W. (2010). Basic Linguistic Theory: Volume 1: Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Everett, D. L. (2012). Linguistic Relativity: Evidence Across Languages and Cognitive Domains. Walter de Gruyter.
Nichols, J. (2017). The Languages of the World (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (Eds.). (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C., & Enfield, N. J. (Eds.). (2006). Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Interaction. Berg Publishers.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three Factors in Language Design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 1-22.
Mithun, M. (2001). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press.
